Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Gøran
dc.contributor.authorStien, Nicolay
dc.contributor.authorBaarholm, Martin
dc.contributor.authorSeynnes, Olivier R.
dc.contributor.authorSæterbakken, Atle Hole
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-24T09:56:22Z
dc.date.available2022-03-24T09:56:22Z
dc.date.created2021-10-29T09:18:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationAndersen, V., Paulsen, G., Stien, N., Baarholm, M., Seynnes, O., & Saeterbakken, A. H. (2021). Resistance training with different velocity loss thresholds induce similar changes in strengh and hypertrophy. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2987272
dc.descriptionWill not be available, due to copyright restrictionsen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the effects of 2 velocity-based resistance training programs when performing resistance training with matched training volume. Ten resistance-trained adults volunteered (age, 23 ± 4.3 years; body mass, 68 ± 8.9 kg; and height, 171 ± 8 cm) with a mean resistance training experience of 4.5 years. A within person, between leg design was used. For each subject, the legs were randomly assigned to either low velocity loss (LVL) threshold at 15% or high velocity loss (HVL) threshold at 30% velocity loss. Leg press and leg extension were trained unilaterally twice per week over a period of 9 weeks. Before and after the intervention, both legs were tested in 1 repetition maximum (RM) (kg), maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) (N), rate of force development (N·s−1), average velocity (m·s−1), and power output (W) at 30, 45, 60, and 75% of 1 RM (all in unilateral leg press). Furthermore, muscle thickness (mm) of the vastus lateralis and rectus femoris, pennation angle (°) of the vastus lateralis, and the fascicle length (mm) of the vastus lateralis were measured using ultrasound imaging. The data were analyzed using mixed-design analysis of variance. No differences between the legs in any of the variables were found; however, both low and HVL were effective for increasing 1 RM (ES = 1.25–1.82), MVC (effect size [ES] = 0.42–0.64), power output (ES = 0.31–0.86), and muscle thickness (ES = 0.24–0.51). In conclusion, performing velocity-based resistance training with low and HVL with equal training volume resulted in similar effects in maximal and explosive strength in addition to muscular adaptations.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.titleResistance Training With Different Velocity Loss Thresholds Induce Similar Changes in Strengh and Hypertrophyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 National Strength and Conditioning Associationen_US
dc.source.pagenumber8en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Researchen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000004067
dc.identifier.cristin1949502
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel