Resistance Training With Different Velocity Loss Thresholds Induce Similar Changes in Strengh and Hypertrophy
Andersen, Vidar; Paulsen, Gøran; Stien, Nicolay; Baarholm, Martin; Seynnes, Olivier R.; Sæterbakken, Atle Hole
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
View/ Open
Date
2021Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- Import fra CRIStin [3813]
- Institutt for idrett, kosthald og naturfag [1106]
Original version
Andersen, V., Paulsen, G., Stien, N., Baarholm, M., Seynnes, O., & Saeterbakken, A. H. (2021). Resistance training with different velocity loss thresholds induce similar changes in strengh and hypertrophy. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004067Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 2 velocity-based resistance training programs when performing resistance training with matched training volume. Ten resistance-trained adults volunteered (age, 23 ± 4.3 years; body mass, 68 ± 8.9 kg; and height, 171 ± 8 cm) with a mean resistance training experience of 4.5 years. A within person, between leg design was used. For each subject, the legs were randomly assigned to either low velocity loss (LVL) threshold at 15% or high velocity loss (HVL) threshold at 30% velocity loss. Leg press and leg extension were trained unilaterally twice per week over a period of 9 weeks. Before and after the intervention, both legs were tested in 1 repetition maximum (RM) (kg), maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) (N), rate of force development (N·s−1), average velocity (m·s−1), and power output (W) at 30, 45, 60, and 75% of 1 RM (all in unilateral leg press). Furthermore, muscle thickness (mm) of the vastus lateralis and rectus femoris, pennation angle (°) of the vastus lateralis, and the fascicle length (mm) of the vastus lateralis were measured using ultrasound imaging. The data were analyzed using mixed-design analysis of variance. No differences between the legs in any of the variables were found; however, both low and HVL were effective for increasing 1 RM (ES = 1.25–1.82), MVC (effect size [ES] = 0.42–0.64), power output (ES = 0.31–0.86), and muscle thickness (ES = 0.24–0.51). In conclusion, performing velocity-based resistance training with low and HVL with equal training volume resulted in similar effects in maximal and explosive strength in addition to muscular adaptations.
Description
Will not be available, due to copyright restrictions