Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSæterbakken, Atle Hole
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorBehm, David G
dc.contributor.authorBårdstu, Hilde Bremseth
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Vidar
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-25T08:19:05Z
dc.date.available2020-03-25T08:19:05Z
dc.date.created2020-01-01T10:23:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSæterbakken, A. H., Olsen, A., Behm, D. G., Bardstu, H. B., & Andersen, V. (2019). The short- and long-term effects of resistance training with different stability requirements. Plos One, 14(4).en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2648473
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to assess the short- and long-term effects of resistance training (RT) with different stability requirements. Fifty-nine men underwent a 3-week familiarization period followed by a 7-week training period. During familiarization, all participants trained four sessions of squats with a Smith machine, free weights and free weights standing on a wobble board. After week-3, participants were randomized into a low (Smith machine), medium (Free-weight) or high (Wobble board) stability RT program, and Control group. All participants were tested pre-, after week-3 and post-intervention. Ten repetition maximum (10RM), rate of force development (RFD), electromyography (EMG) and maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) were tested in all three squat conditions in addition to countermovement jump (CMJ) on stable and unstable surfaces, and muscle thickness. After familiarization, greater 10RM loads (21.8–27.3%), MVIC (7.4–13.5%), RFD (29.7–43.8%) and CMJ (4.9–8.5%) were observed in all conditions. Between week 3 and 10, the Free-weight and Wobble board groups similarly improved 10RM in all conditions. Smith machine group demonstrated greater improvement in the trained exercise than the medium and high stability exercises. All training groups showed similar improvement in muscle thickness, RFD and MVIC. There was no CMJ improvement on the stable surface, but the Wobble board group demonstrated significantly greater improvement on the unstable surface. In conclusion, low, medium or high stability RT resulted in similar improvements in trained and non-trained testing conditions except for greater CMJ on the unstable surface in the Wobble group. Greater 10RM strength in trained than non-trained exercise was only observed in low stability group. Familiarization was associated with substantial improvements in 10RM and CMJ, with greater improvement associated with higher stability requirements. These findings suggest that high stability can increase strength, muscle thickness and explosive measurements similar to training with lower stability.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPLoSen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectstrength trainingen_US
dc.subjectelectromyographyen_US
dc.subjectmuscle analysisen_US
dc.subjectkneesen_US
dc.subjectlegsen_US
dc.subjectmuscle contractionen_US
dc.subjectsignal filteringen_US
dc.subjecthand strengthen_US
dc.titleThe short and long-term effects of resistance training with different stability requirementsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Saeterbakken et al.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Idrettsmedisinske fag: 850::Treningslære: 851en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-18en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0214302
dc.identifier.cristin1764641
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal