Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStien, Nicolay
dc.contributor.authorSæterbakken, Atle Hole
dc.contributor.authorHermans, Espen
dc.contributor.authorVereide, Vegard Albert
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Elias
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Vidar
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-30T08:58:42Z
dc.date.available2019-10-30T08:58:42Z
dc.date.created2019-10-24T12:55:49Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationStien, N., Saeterbakken, A. H., Hermans, E., Vereide, V. A., Olsen, E. & Andersen, V. (2019). Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers. Plos One, 14(9).nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2625313
dc.description.abstractAlbeit differences in climbing-specific strength of the forearms have been demonstrated between lead and boulder climbers, little is known about the potential differences in force and power output of the upper body pulling-apparatus between disciplines. The aim of this study was to compare the climbing-specific upper-body strength and finger flexor endurance between lead and boulder climbers, as well as to examine the relative utilization of force when testing on a ledge hold compared to a jug hold. Sixteen boulder climbers (red-point climbing grade 17.9 ± 3.3) and fifteen lead climbers (red-point climbing grade 20.5 ± 3.5) performing on an advanced level volunteered for the study. Peak force, average force and rate of force development (RFD) were measured during an isometric pull-up, average velocity in dynamic pull-up, and finger flexor endurance in an intermittent test to fatigue. The isometric pull-up was performed on a ledge hold (high finger strength requirements) and on a jug hold (very low finger strength requirements). Boulder climbers demonstrated a higher maximal and explosive strength in all strength and power measurements (26.2–52.9%, ES = 0.90–1.12, p = 0.006–0.023), whereas the finger flexor endurance test showed no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.088). Both groups were able to utilize 57–69% of peak force, average force and RFD in the ledge condition compared to the jug condition, but the relative utilization was not different between the groups (p = 0.290–0.996). In conclusion, boulder climbers were stronger and more explosive compared to lead climbers, whereas no differences in finger flexor endurance were observed. Performing climbing-specific tests on a smaller hold appears to limit the force and power output equally between the two groups.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherPLoSnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbersnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Stien et al.nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Idrettsmedisinske fag: 850::Treningslære: 851nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-13nb_NO
dc.source.volume14nb_NO
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEnb_NO
dc.source.issue9nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0222529
dc.identifier.cristin1740207
cristin.unitcode203,10,1,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for idrett, kosthald og naturfag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal