Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBasnet, Prativa
dc.contributor.authorSkjaerven, Rolv
dc.contributor.authorHarmon, Quaker E.
dc.contributor.authorSørbye, Linn Marie
dc.contributor.authorMorken, Nils-Halvdan
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Aditi
dc.contributor.authorKlungsøyr, Kari
dc.contributor.authorKvalvik, Liv Grimstvedt
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-08T10:30:07Z
dc.date.available2023-12-08T10:30:07Z
dc.date.created2023-10-31T14:39:19Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2023, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1470-0328
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3106581
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes between twin-born and singleton-born women. We also evaluated whether in utero exposure to pre-eclampsia or preterm delivery affected adverse pregnancy outcomes in women's own pregnancies. Design Population-based cohort study. Setting Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1967–2020. Population 9184 twin-born and 492 894 singleton-born women during 1967–2005, with their later pregnancies registered during 1981–2020. Methods Data from an individual's birth were linked to their later pregnancies. We used generalised linear models with log link binomial distribution to obtain exponentiated regression coefficients that estimated relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between twin- or singleton-born women and later adverse pregnancy outcomes. Main outcome measures Pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery or perinatal loss in twin-born compared with singleton-born women. Results There was no increased risk for adverse outcomes in twin-born compared with singleton-born women: adjusted RRs for pre-eclampsia were 1.00 (95% CI 0.93–1.09), for preterm delivery 0.96 (95% CI 0.90–1.02) and for perinatal loss 1.00 (95% CI 0.84–1.18). Compared with singleton-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia in utero, twin-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia had lower risk of adverse outcomes in their own pregnancies; the aRR for pre-eclampsia was 0.73 (95% CI 0.58–0.91) and for preterm delivery was 0.71 (95% CI 0.56–0.90). Compared with preterm singleton-born women, preterm twin-born women did not differ in terms of risk of pre-eclampsia (aRR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92–1.21) or perinatal loss (aRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.71–1.37) and had reduced risk of preterm delivery (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74–0.94). Conclusions Twin-born women did not differ from singleton-born women in terms of risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Twin-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia in utero, had a lower risk of pre-eclampsia and preterm delivery compared with singleton-born women exposed to pre-eclampsia.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRisk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in twin- and singleton-born women: An inter-generational cohort studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Authors.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber9en_US
dc.source.journalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1471-0528.17690
dc.identifier.cristin2190604
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/833076en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal