Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGinsburg, Liane
dc.contributor.authorHoben, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorBerta, Whitney
dc.contributor.authorDoupe, Malcolm
dc.contributor.authorEstabrooks, Carole A
dc.contributor.authorNorton, Peter G
dc.contributor.authorReid, Colin
dc.contributor.authorGeerts, Ariane
dc.contributor.authorWagg, Adrian
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T07:31:57Z
dc.date.available2023-11-17T07:31:57Z
dc.date.created2023-09-22T10:36:10Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Quality and Safety. 2023, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-5415
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3103098
dc.description.abstractBackground In many quality improvement (QI) and other complex interventions, assessing the fidelity with which participants ‘enact’ intervention activities (ie, implement them as intended) is underexplored. Adapting the evaluative approach used in objective structured clinical examinations, we aimed to develop and validate a practical approach to assessing fidelity enactment—the Overall Fidelity Enactment Scale for Complex Interventions (OFES-CI). Methods We developed the OFES-CI to evaluate enactment of the SCOPE QI intervention, which teaches nursing home teams to use plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. The OFES-CI was piloted and revised early in SCOPE with good inter-rater reliability, so we proceeded with a single rater. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess inter-rater reliability. For 27 SCOPE teams, we used ICC to compare two methods for assessing fidelity enactment: (1) OFES-CI ratings provided by one of five trained experts who observed structured 6 min PDSA progress presentations made at the end of SCOPE, (2) average rating of two coders’ deductive content analysis of qualitative process evaluation data collected during the final 3 months of SCOPE (our gold standard). Results Using Cicchetti’s classification, inter-rater reliability between two coders who derived the gold standard enactment score was ‘excellent’ (ICC=0.93, 95% CI=0.85 to 0.97). Inter-rater reliability between the OFES-CI and the gold standard was good (ICC=0.71, 95% CI=0.46 to 0.86), after removing one team where open-text comments were discrepant with the rating. Rater feedback suggests the OFES-CI has strong face validity and positive implementation qualities (acceptability, easy to use, low training requirements). Conclusions The OFES-CI provides a promising novel approach for assessing fidelity enactment in QI and other complex interventions. It demonstrates good reliability against our gold standard assessment approach and addresses the practicality problem in fidelity assessment by virtue of its suitable implementation qualities. Steps for adapting the OFES-CI to other complex interventions are offered.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of the Overall Fidelity Enactment Scale for Complex Interventions (OFES-CI)en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023en_US
dc.source.pagenumber11en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Quality and Safetyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016001
dc.identifier.cristin2177823
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 188928en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal