Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVik, Eline Skirnisdottir
dc.contributor.authorØstenfor, Marte Myre
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Anne Britt Vika
dc.contributor.authorAasekjær, Katrine
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-09T11:04:39Z
dc.date.available2023-06-09T11:04:39Z
dc.date.created2023-05-11T14:33:16Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationMidwifery. 2023, 122 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0266-6138
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3070734
dc.description.abstractObjective The aim of this study was to explore midwives’ experiences with a safe childbirth checklist used in handover situations from birth to hospital discharge. Quality of care and patient safety is highly recognised and a priority within health services globally. In handover situations, checklists have proven to reduce unwanted variation by standardising processes, which in turn contribute to increased quality of care. To improve the quality of care, a safe childbirth checklist was implemented at a large maternity hospital in Norway. Design We conducted a Glaserian grounded theory (GT) study. Setting and participants A total of 16 midwives were included. We included three midwives in one focus group and conducted 13 individual interviews. Years of experience as midwives ranged from one to 30 years. All included midwives worked in a large maternity hospital in Norway. Findings The main concern faced by the midwives who used the checklist included no common understanding of the purpose of the checklist nor consensus on how to use the checklist. The generated grounded theory, individualistic interpretation of the checklist, involved the following three strategies that all seemed to explain how the midwives solved their main concern: 1) not questioning the checklist, 2) constantly evaluating the checklist, and 3) distancing oneself from the checklist. Experiencing an unfortunate event concerning the healthcare of both mother or newborn was a condition that could alter the midwives understanding and use of the checklist. Key conclusions The findings in this study showed that a general lack of common understanding and consensus on the rationale for implementing a safe childbirth checklist led to variations between midwives in how and whether the checklist was used. The safe childbirth checklist was described as long and detailed. It was not necessarily the midwife who was expected to sign the checklist who had carried out the tasks signed for. To ensure patient safety, recommendations for future practice include securing that separate sections of a safe childbirth checklist are limited to a specific time-point and midwife. Implications for practice Findings emphasise the importance of implementation strategies supervised by the leaders of the healthcare services. Further research should explore the understanding of organisational and cultural context when implementing a safe childbirth checklist to clinical practice.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMidwives’ experiences with a safe childbirth checklist: A grounded theory studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber7en_US
dc.source.volume122en_US
dc.source.journalMidwiferyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.midw.2023.103676
dc.identifier.cristin2146970
dc.source.articlenumber103676en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal