Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorHermans, Espen
dc.contributor.authorVereide, Vegard Albert
dc.contributor.authorStien, Nicolay
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Gøran
dc.contributor.authorBaláš, Jiří
dc.contributor.authorMichailov, Michail Lubomirov
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Helene
dc.contributor.authorSæterbakken, Atle Hole
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-24T09:24:13Z
dc.date.available2023-03-24T09:24:13Z
dc.date.created2023-03-10T12:44:00Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports. 2023, 13 (1):3287.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3060264
dc.description.abstractThis study compared perceptional and physiological responses of finger flexor exercise performed with free flow and blood flow restriction (BFR). Thirteen male advanced climbers completed three sessions of finger flexor resistance exercise at (1) 40% of MVC (Low) and (2) 75% of MVC (High) and (3) BFR at 40% of MVC (Low + BFR) in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Rate of perceived exertion for effort (RPE) and discomfort (RPD), session pleasure/displeasure (sPDF), exercise enjoyment (EES), lactate concentration and oxygen saturation were recorded after the last set. Both low-intensity sessions induced higher RPD than High (p = 0.018–0.022, ES = 1.01–1.09) and High was perceived as more enjoyable than Low-BFR (p = 0.031, ES = 1.08). No differences were found for RPE or sPDF (p = 0.132–0.804). Lactate was elevated more after High than the Low-sessions (p < 0.001, ES = 1.88–2.08). Capillary oxygen saturation was lower after Low + BFR compared to the other sessions (p = 0.031, ES = 1.04–1.27). Finally, the exercise volume was greater in Low compared to High (p = 0.022, ES = 1.14) and Low + BFR (p = 0.020, ES = 0.77). In conclusion, among advanced male climbers, performing Low + BFR led to a similar exercise volume but was perceived as more discomforting and less enjoyable compared to High. The Low session yielded similar responses as the Low + BFR but required a much greater exercise volume.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNature Portfolioen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleComparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbersen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2023en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalScientific Reportsen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-023-30499-x
dc.identifier.cristin2133020
dc.source.articlenumber3287en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal