Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
![Thumbnail](/hvlopen-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2981974/Kaiser.pdf.jpg?sequence=7&isAllowed=y)
Åpne
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2981974Utgivelsesdato
2022Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
- Import fra CRIStin [3621]
- Institutt for velferd og deltaking [1020]
Originalversjon
Kaiser, M., Drivdal, L., Hjellbrekke, J., Ingierd, H., & Rekdal, O. B. (2021). Questionable research practices and misconduct among Norwegian researchers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(1). 10.1007/s11948-021-00351-4Sammendrag
This article presents results from the national survey conducted in 2018 for the project Research Integrity in Norway (RINO). A total of 31,206 questionnaires were sent out to Norwegian researchers by e-mail, and 7291 responses were obtained. In this paper, we analyse the survey data to determine attitudes towards and the prevalence of fabrication, falsification and plagiarism (FFP) and contrast this with attitudes towards and the prevalence of the more questionable research practices (QRPs) surveyed. Our results show a relatively low percentage of self-reported FFPs (0.2–0.3%), while the number of researchers who report having committed one of the QRPs during the last three years reached a troublesome 40%. The article also presents a ranking of the perceived severity of FFP and QRPs among Norwegian researchers. Overall, there is a widespread normative consensus, where FFP is considered more troublesome than QRPs.
Utgiver
SpringerTidsskrift
Science and Engineering EthicsOpphavsrett
© The Author(s) 2021Beslektede innførsler
Viser innførsler beslektet ved tittel, forfatter og emneord.
-
Researcher-researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability
Råheim, Målfrid; Magnussen, Liv Heide; Sekse, Ragnhild Johanne Tveit; Lunde, Åshild; Jacobsen, Torild; Blystad, Astrid (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2016) -
The (un-)ethical interpreting researcher: The researcher’s voice and discretionary power in interpreting research
Tiselius, Elisabet (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2018)This article discusses different aspects of research ethics, the researcher’s voice and discretionary power in interpreting studies. Research ethics is laid down in international conventions, which in turn are reflected ... -
Dementia Researchers’ Inside Views on Research Networks and Alignment With Public Research Funding: A Qualitative Study
Fusdahl, Peter Fredrik; Testad, Ingelin; Årsland, Dag; Braut, Geir Sverre (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2023)This study presents the dementia researchers views of research networks, and how the networks fit into their pursuit of research objectives and dementia research funding. We conducted 10 semi-structured interviews with 10 ...