Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSolstad, Tom Erik Jorung
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Matthew Peter
dc.contributor.authorHoel, Erlend M.
dc.contributor.authorSæterbakken, Atle Hole
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-14T11:46:11Z
dc.date.available2020-12-14T11:46:11Z
dc.date.created2020-09-21T11:45:32Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSolstad, T. E., Andersen, V., Shaw, M., Hoel, E. M., Vonheim, A., & Sæterbakken, A. H. (2020). A comparison of muscle activation between barbell bench press and dumbbell flyes in resistance-trained males. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 19, 645–651.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1303-2968
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2719144
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study was to compare the muscle activity in the prime movers and antagonist between the barbell bench press (BBP) and the dumbbell flyes (DF) Seventeen resistance-trained men (age 22.9 ± 1.8 yrs; height 1.80 ± 0.06 m; body mass 80.0 ± 8.3 kg), with 4.8 ± 2.0 years resistance training experience, completed the study. The surface electromyographic activation was measured in four different muscles (pectoralis major, anterior deltoids, triceps brachii, and biceps brachii) during six repetition maximum loads in both exercises. To better understand eventual differences, an in-depth analysis of the fifth repetition was performed, dividing it into six phases (lower, middle, and upper phase of the descending and ascending movement). The results showed a higher muscle activation in the whole movement and the majority of the lifting phases for pectoralis major, deltoids anterior, and triceps brachii for the BBP compared to the DF (8-81 %, p ≤ 0.05). However, the antagonist biceps brachii showed a higher muscle activation (57-86 %, p ≤ 0.05) in the DF compared to the BBP. In conclusion, both exercises could be included in training programs, but the BBP should be emphasized because of the higher muscle activation overall. Among specific populations, were tasks based on strength and control in a horizontal shoulder flexion position with extended elbows often occurs, the DF might prove useful.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectstrength trainingen_US
dc.subjectpectoralis majoren_US
dc.subjectneuromuscular activationen_US
dc.subjectmulti-jointen_US
dc.subjectsingle-jointen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Muscle Activation between Barbell Bench Press and Dumbbell Flyes in Resistance-Trained Malesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder©Journal of Sports Science and Medicineen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Idrettsmedisinske fag: 850::Treningslære: 851en_US
dc.source.pagenumber645–651en_US
dc.source.volume19en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Sports Science and Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.cristin1831588
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal