Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFrøyd, Christian
dc.contributor.authorBeltrami, Fernando G.
dc.contributor.authorMillet, Guillaume Y.
dc.contributor.authorMacIntosh, Brian R.
dc.contributor.authorNoakes, Timothy D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-30T07:52:47Z
dc.date.available2020-11-30T07:52:47Z
dc.date.created2020-08-28T20:28:38Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationFrøyd, C., Beltrami, F. G., Millet, G. Y., MacIntosh, B. R., & Noakes, T. D. (2020). Greater short-time recovery of peripheral fatigue after short- compared with long-duration time trial. Frontiers in Physiology, 11, 399.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-042X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2690050
dc.description.abstractThe kinetics of recovery from neuromuscular fatigue resulting from exercise time trials (TTs) of different durations are not well-known. The aim of this study was to determine if TTs of three different durations would result in different short-term recovery in maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and evoked peak forces. Twelve trained subjects performed repetitive concentric right knee extensions on an isokinetic dynamometer self-paced to last 3, 10, and 40 min (TTs). Neuromuscular function was assessed immediately (<2 s) and 1, 2, 4, and 8 min after completion of each TT using MVCs and electrical stimulation. Electrical stimulations consisted of single stimulus (SS), paired stimuli at 10 Hz (PS10), and paired stimuli at 100 Hz (PS100). Electrically evoked forces including the ratio of low- to high-frequency doublets were similar between trials at exercise cessation but subsequently increased more (P < 0.05) after the 3 min TT compared with either the 10 or 40 min TT when measured at 1 or 2 min of recovery. MVC force was not different between trials. The results demonstrate that recovery of peripheral fatigue including low-frequency fatigue depends on the duration and intensity of the preceding self-paced exercise. These differences in recovery probably indicate differences in the mechanisms of fatigue for these different TTs. Because recovery is faster after a 3 min TT than a 40 min TT, delayed assessment of fatigue will detect a difference in peripheral fatigue between trials that was not present at exercise cessation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectperipheral fatigueen_US
dc.subjectrecoveryen_US
dc.subjectmaximal voluntary contractionen_US
dc.subjectfemoral nerve electrical stimulationen_US
dc.subjectmotor unit recruitmenten_US
dc.subjectelectromyographyen_US
dc.subjectself-paced exerciseen_US
dc.titleGreater short-time recovery of peripheral fatigue after short- compared with long-duration time trialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2020 Froyd, Beltrami, Millet, MacIntosh and Noakes.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Idrettsmedisinske fag: 850en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-12en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Physiologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2020.00399
dc.identifier.cristin1825873
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal