Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHovlid, Einar
dc.contributor.authorBraut, Geir Sverre
dc.contributor.authorHannsidal, Einar
dc.contributor.authorWalshe, Kieran
dc.contributor.authorBukve, Oddbjørn
dc.contributor.authorFlottorp, Signe Agnes
dc.contributor.authorStensland, Per Steinar
dc.contributor.authorFrich, Jan C
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T13:03:48Z
dc.date.available2020-09-18T13:03:48Z
dc.date.created2020-09-01T20:35:05Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationHovlid, E., Braut, G. S., Hannisdal, E., Walshe, K., Bukve, O., Flottorp, S., Stensland, P., & Frich, J. C. (2020). Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. BMJ Open, 10(8).en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2678539
dc.description.abstractObjectives External inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspections. Methods We performed a literature search (1980–January 2020) to identify empirical studies addressing change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspection. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we performed a narrative synthesis to identify mediators of change. Results We included 95 studies. Accreditation was the most frequent type of inspection (n=68), followed by statutory inspections (n=19), and external peer review (n=9). Our findings suggest that the regulatory context in which the inspections take place affect how they are acted on by those being inspected. The way inspections are conducted seem to be critical for how the inspection findings are perceived and followed up. Inspections can engage and involve staff, facilitate leader engagement, improve communication and enable the creation of new networks for reflection on clinical practice. Inspections can contribute to creating an awareness of the inspected organisation’s current practice and performance gaps, and a commitment to change. Moreover, they can contribute to facilitating the planning and implementation of change, as well as self-evaluation and the use of data to evaluate performance. Conclusions External inspections can affect different mediators of organisational change. The way and to what extent they do depend on a range of factors related to the outer setting, the way inspections are conducted and how they are perceived and acted on by the inspected organisation. To improve the quality of care, the organisational change processes need to involve and impact the way care is delivered to the patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesisen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020.en_US
dc.source.volume10en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Openen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038850
dc.identifier.cristin1826605
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal