Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBreidablik, Hans Johan
dc.contributor.authorLysebo, Dag Einar
dc.contributor.authorJohannessen, Lene
dc.contributor.authorSkare, Åse
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, John Roger
dc.contributor.authorKleiven, Ole Tormod
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-21T11:56:54Z
dc.date.available2019-03-21T11:56:54Z
dc.date.created2019-02-07T15:55:17Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBreidablik, H. J., Lysebo, D. E., Johannessen, L., Skare, Å., Andersen, J. R., & Kleiven, O. T. (2019). Ozonized water as an alternative to alcohol-based hand disinfection. Journal of Hospital Infection.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0195-6701
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2591065
dc.descriptionAuthor's accepted manuscript (post-print).en_US
dc.descriptionAvailable: 2020-02-05.
dc.description.abstractBackground Hand hygiene plays a vital role in the prevention of transmission of micro-organisms. Ozone (O3) is a highly reactive gas with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial effects on bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. It can easily be produced locally in small generators, and dissolved in tap water, and quickly transmits into ordinary O2 in the surrounding air. Aim To compare ozonized tap water and alcohol rub in decontamination of bacterially contaminated hands. Methods A cross-over study among 30 nursing students. Hands were artificially contaminated with Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), then sanitized with ozonized tap water (0.8 or 4 ppm) or 3 mL standard alcohol-based rub (Antibac 85%). The transient microbes from fingers were cultivated and colony-forming units (cfu)/mL were counted. The test procedure was modified from European Standard EN 1500:2013. Findings All contaminated hands before disinfection showed cfu >30,000/mL. The mean (SD) bacterial counts in (cfu/mL) on both hands combined were 1017 (1391) after using ozonized water, and 2337 (4664) after alcohol hand disinfection. The median (range) values were 500 (0–6700) and 250 (0–16,000) respectively (non-significant difference). Twenty per cent of participants reported adverse skin effects (burning/dryness) from alcohol disinfection compared with no adverse sensations with ozone. Conclusion Ozonized tap water is an effective decontaminant of E. coli, and it could be an alternative to traditional alcohol-fluid hand disinfectants both in healthcare institutions and public places. Ozonized water may be especially valuable for individuals with skin problems.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectozoneen_US
dc.subjectalcohol ruben_US
dc.subjecthand disinfectionen_US
dc.subjecte. colien_US
dc.titleOzonized water as an alternative to alcohol-based hand disinfectionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Infeksjonsmedisin: 776nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Hospital Infectionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhin.2019.01.026
dc.identifier.cristin1674635
cristin.unitcode203,11,1,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for helse- og omsorgsvitskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal