dc.contributor.author | Binder, Per-Einar | |
dc.contributor.author | Schanche, Elisabeth | |
dc.contributor.author | Holgersen, Helge | |
dc.contributor.author | Nielsen, Geir Høstmark | |
dc.contributor.author | Hjeltnes, Aslak | |
dc.contributor.author | Stige, Signe Hjelen | |
dc.contributor.author | Veseth, Marius | |
dc.contributor.author | Moltu, Christian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-01T15:09:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-01T15:09:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Binder P-E, Schanche E, Holgersen H, Nielsen GH, Hjeltnes A, Stige SH, Veseth M, Moltu C. Why do we need qualitative research on psychological treatments? The case for discovery, reflexivity, critique, receptivity, and evocation. Scandinavian Psychologist. 2016;3:e8 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1894-5570 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2481951 | |
dc.description | - | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Scandinavian Psychologist | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Norway | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/no/ | |
dc.title | Why do we need qualitative research on psychological treatments? The case for discovery, reflexivity, critique, receptivity, and evocation | |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.date.updated | 2017-10-31T08:51:57Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15714/scandpsychol.3.e8 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1358190 | |