Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBinder, Per-Einar
dc.contributor.authorSchanche, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorHolgersen, Helge
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Geir Høstmark
dc.contributor.authorHjeltnes, Aslak
dc.contributor.authorStige, Signe Hjelen
dc.contributor.authorVeseth, Marius
dc.contributor.authorMoltu, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T15:09:50Z
dc.date.available2018-02-01T15:09:50Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationBinder P-E, Schanche E, Holgersen H, Nielsen GH, Hjeltnes A, Stige SH, Veseth M, Moltu C. Why do we need qualitative research on psychological treatments? The case for discovery, reflexivity, critique, receptivity, and evocation. Scandinavian Psychologist. 2016;3:e8
dc.identifier.issn1894-5570
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2481951
dc.description-
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofScandinavian Psychologist
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Norway
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/no/
dc.titleWhy do we need qualitative research on psychological treatments? The case for discovery, reflexivity, critique, receptivity, and evocation
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.date.updated2017-10-31T08:51:57Z
dc.identifier.doi10.15714/scandpsychol.3.e8
dc.identifier.cristin1358190


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Norway
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Norway