Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEngebretsen, Ingunn MS
dc.contributor.authorMoland, Karen M
dc.contributor.authorNankunda, Jolly
dc.contributor.authorKaramagi, Charles A
dc.contributor.authorTylleskar, Thorkild
dc.contributor.authorTumwine, James K
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T15:08:18Z
dc.date.available2018-02-01T15:08:18Z
dc.date.issued2010-10-26
dc.identifier.citationdoi:10.1186/1746-4358-5-13en_US
dc.identifier.issn1746-4358
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2481749
dc.description.abstractBackground: In resource-poor settings, HIV positive mothers are recommended to choose between 'Exclusive breastfeeding' (EBF) or 'Exclusive replacement feeding' (ERF). Acceptability, Feasibility, Affordability, Sustainability and Safety (AFASS) has been the World Health Organization (WHO)'s a priori criteria for ERF the last ten years. 'AFASS' has become a mere acronym among many workers in the field of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, PMTCT. Thereby, non-breastfeeding has been suggested irrespective of social norms. EBF for the first half of infancy is associated with huge health benefits for children in areas where infant mortality is high. But, even if EBF has been recommended for a decade, few mothers are practicing it. We set out to understand fathers' and mothers' infant feeding perceptions and the degree to which EBF and ERF were 'AFASS.' Methods: Eight focus groups with 81 informants provided information for inductive content analysis. Four groups were held by men among men and four groups by women among women in Mbale District, Eastern Uganda. Results: Two study questions emerged: How are the different feeding options understood and accepted? And, what are men's and women's responsibilities related to infant feeding? A mother's commitment to breastfeed and the husband's commitment to provide for the family came out strongly. Not breastfeeding a newborn was seen as dangerous and as unacceptable, except in cases of maternal illness. Men argued that not breastfeeding could entail sanctions by kin or in court. But, in general, both men and women regarded EBF as 'not enough' or even 'harmful.' Among men, not giving supplements to breast milk was associated with poverty and men's failure as providers. Women emphasised lack of time, exhaustion, poverty and hunger as factors for limited breast milk production. Although women had attended antenatal teaching they expressed a need to know more. Most men felt left out from health education. Conclusion: Breastfeeding was the expected way to feed the baby, but even with existing knowledge among mothers, EBF was generally perceived as impossible. ERF was overall negatively sanctioned. Greater culture-sensitivity in programs promoting safer infant feeding in general and in HIV-contexts in particular is urgently needed, and male involvement is imperative. Trial Registration The study was part of formative studies for the ongoing study PROMISE EBF registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00397150).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Breastfeeding Journalen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries2010, 5:13en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 2.0 Internasjonal
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.no
dc.subject.otherbreastfeedingen_US
dc.subject.otherugandaen_US
dc.subject.otherexclusive breastfeedingen_US
dc.subject.otherexclusive replacement feedingen_US
dc.subject.othereastern Ugandaen_US
dc.subject.othermale involvementen_US
dc.titleGendered perceptions on infant feeding in Eastern Uganda: continued need for exclusive breastfeeding supporten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Sykepleievitenskap: 808en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 2.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 2.0 Internasjonal