Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHysing-Dahl, Trine
dc.contributor.authorMagnussen, Liv Heide
dc.contributor.authorFaleide, Anne Gro Heyn
dc.contributor.authorKjellsen, Asle
dc.contributor.authorMo, Ingunn Fleten
dc.contributor.authorWaaler, Per Arne Skarstein
dc.contributor.authorMundal, Renate
dc.contributor.authorInderhaug, Eivind
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-08T08:26:04Z
dc.date.available2023-09-08T08:26:04Z
dc.date.created2023-06-12T15:03:42Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM). 2023, 11 (5), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2325-9671
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3088133
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 is a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with patellofemoral instability. While good psychometric properties have been demonstrated, the data lack cross-cultural validity, construct validity, and an established measurement error. Purpose: To (1) translate and cross-culturally adapt the BPII 2.0 to the Norwegian version (BPII 2.0–No) and (2) examine the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The BPII 2.0 was translated according to international guidelines. A cohort of 100 patients surgically treated for recurrent patellofemoral instability completed the BPII 2.0–No, related outcome measures (Norwich Patellar Instability Score, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form 2000, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), and functional tests (Y-Balance Test–Lower Quarter, single-leg hop tests, and knee extension strength) before and/or 6 months after surgery. We evaluated the face and content validity, internal consistency (Cronbach α), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), measurement error (SEM and smallest detectable change at the individual [SDCind] and group levels [SDCgroup]). Construct validity was assessed by testing 9 hypotheses on the correlation between the BPII 2.0–No and the outcome measures/functional tests (Pearson r). Results: The BPII 2.0–No had good face and content validity. Internal consistency was excellent (α = .95), and no floor or ceiling effects were found. Test-retest reliability was high (ICC2,1 = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.93), and measurement error was low (SEM = 7.1). The SDCind was 19.7 points and the SDCgroup was 2.8 points. Eight of the 9 hypotheses regarding construct validity were confirmed. Conclusion: The BPII 2.0–No was found to be valid and reliable. This study adds further knowledge on the measurement properties of the BPII 2.0 that can be used internationally.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCross-cultural Validation of the NorwegianVersion of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2023en_US
dc.source.pagenumber8en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.journalOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM)en_US
dc.source.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/23259671231168881
dc.identifier.cristin2153863
dc.source.articlenumber23259671231168881en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal