Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWijkmark, Cecilia Hammar
dc.contributor.authorde França Bail, Rosangela
dc.contributor.authorLog, Maria-Monika Metallinou
dc.contributor.authorHeldal, Ilona
dc.contributor.authorMichaloski, Ariel Orlei
dc.contributor.authorAguiar, Eduardo Jose Slomp
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-09T12:09:14Z
dc.date.available2023-03-09T12:09:14Z
dc.date.created2022-11-16T22:58:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationAlkalmazott Műszaki és Pedagógiai tudományos folyóirat. 2022, 12 (3), 1-24.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2560-5429
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3057353
dc.description.abstractThe emergence of immersive virtual reality (IVR) technologies has raised interest in the use of fire and rescue services (FRS) as a supplement to the established practice-based hot fire-live simulation (HF-LS) training. This is due to features such as time efficiency, portable technologies, and training in scenarios not possible in HF-LS. However, whether IVR provides realistic firefighter training situations has been called into question. Previous studies have revealed differences regarding perceived presence in, and attitudes toward IVR training between novice firefighters (who can only relate to HF-LS training) and experienced firefighters (who can relate to both HF-LS and real fires). In the present study, two groups of experienced full-time employed firefighters, 53 from Brazil and 18 from Sweden tested the same IVR technology. The hypothesis was that differences in national education and training programs and real fire experiences might influence experiences in IVR technology. This study examines the differences and similarities in experienced presence, opinions on whether the graphical representations and tasks performed convey realism, and attitudes toward the IVR-supported training format. Data were collected via systematic post-training presence questionnaires and observations. The results revealed a highly experienced presence and perceived realism of the representations by the participants from both countries. However, attitudes toward using IVR technologies differed. The motivation to utilize currently available IVR training tools was higher in Brazil than in Sweden. This may be partly explained by less frequent HF-LS training opportunities in Brazil. Nevertheless, further research is needed to investigate the training transfer of IVR technologies and how these can better support skills training.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherST PRessen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://jates.org/index.php/jatespath/article/view/317
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectFerdighetslæringen_US
dc.subjectSkill-Acquisitionen_US
dc.subjectBrannsikkerheten_US
dc.subjectFire securityen_US
dc.subjectSikkerhet og beredskapen_US
dc.subjectSecurity and preperadnessen_US
dc.titleIntroducing Virtual Reality for Firefighter Skills Training Opinions from Sweden and Brazilen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Annen informasjonsteknologi: 559en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Other information technology: 559en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-24en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalAlkalmazott Műszaki és Pedagógiai tudományos folyóiraten_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.24368/jates.v12i3.317
dc.identifier.cristin2075210
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 298993en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal