Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSenneseth, Mette
dc.contributor.authorPollak, Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorUrheim, Ragnar
dc.contributor.authorLogan, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorPalmstierna, Tom Krisman Kule
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-06T08:55:20Z
dc.date.available2022-10-06T08:55:20Z
dc.date.created2022-01-21T13:50:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationSenneseth, M., Pollak, C., Urheim, R., Logan, C., & Palmstierna, T. (2021). Personal recovery and its challenges in forensic mental health: systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature. BJPsych Open, 8(1):e17.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3024229
dc.description.abstractBackground There has been a call for a framework to guide recovery-oriented practices in forensic mental health services. Aims This study aims to examine personal recovery and its challenges in forensic mental health settings in relation to the established framework for personal recovery in mental illness: connectedness, hope, identity, meaning and empowerment (CHIME). Method This study is an updated and expanded systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature. A systematic search of six electronic databases (Web of Science, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and SocIndex) was carried out in January 2019, using the terms [Recover*] AND [Forensic OR Secure] AND [Patient* OR Offend* OR Service User*]. Only studies that included service user's own perceptions and were published from 2014 onward were included in the review. Data were examined with thematic synthesis and subsequently analysed in relation to the CHIME framework. Results Twenty-one studies were included in the review. Findings suggest that some adjustments to the original CHIME framework are needed for it to be more relevant to forensic populations, and that an additional recovery process regarding feeling safe and being secure (safety and security) could be added to CHIME, providing the CHIME-Secure framework (CHIME-S). Specific challenges and barriers for forensic recovery were identified and found to represent the opposite of the recovery processes defined by CHIME (e.g. hopelessness). Conclusions We present the CHIME-S as a framework for the personal recovery processes of forensic mental health service users. The CHIME-S may guide the recovery-oriented work of forensic mental health services.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePersonal recovery and its challenges in forensic mental health: systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literatureen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s), 2021.en_US
dc.source.volume8en_US
dc.source.journalBJPsych Openen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjo.2021.1068
dc.identifier.cristin1987442
dc.source.articlenumbere17en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal