Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSølie, Jarle Rambo
dc.contributor.authorVolz, Lennart
dc.contributor.authorPettersen, Helge Egil Seime
dc.contributor.authorPiersimoni, Pierluigi
dc.contributor.authorOdland, Odd Harald
dc.contributor.authorRøhrich, Dieter
dc.contributor.authorHelstrup, Håvard
dc.contributor.authorPeitzmann, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorUllaland, Kjetil
dc.contributor.authorVarga-Kofarago, Monika
dc.contributor.authorMehendale, Shruti Vineet
dc.contributor.authorGrøttvik, Ola Slettevoll
dc.contributor.authorEikeland, Viljar Nilsen
dc.contributor.authorMeric, Ilker
dc.contributor.authorSeco, Joao
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-14T08:22:53Z
dc.date.available2020-12-14T08:22:53Z
dc.date.created2020-08-26T12:23:36Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSølie, J. R., Volz, L., Pettersen, H. E. S., Piersimoni, P., Odland, O. H., Röhrich, D., … Seco, J. (2020). Image quality of list-mode proton imaging without front trackers. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 65(13)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0031-9155
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2718986
dc.description.abstractList mode proton imaging relies on accurate reconstruction of the proton most likely path (MLP) through the patient. This typically requires two sets of position sensitive detector systems, one upstream (front) and one downstream (rear) of the patient. However, for a clinical implementation it can be preferable to omit the front trackers (single-sided proton imaging). For such a system, the MLP can be computed from information available through the beam delivery system and the remaining rear tracker set. In this work, we use Monte Carlo simulations to compare a conventional double-sided (using both front and rear detector systems) with a single-sided system (only rear detector system) by evaluating the spatial resolution of proton radiographs (pRad) and proton CT images (pCT) acquired with these set-ups. Both the pencil beam spot size, as well as the spacing between spots was also adjusted to identify the impact of these beam parameters on the image quality. Relying only on the pencil beam central position for computing the MLP resulted in severe image artifacts both in pRad and pCT. Using the recently extended-MLP formalism that incorporate pencil beam uncertainty removed these image artifacts. However, using a more focused pencil beam with this algorithm induced image artifacts when the spot spacing was the same as the beam spot size. The spatial resolution tested with a sharp edge gradient technique was reduced by 40% for single-sided (MTF10% = 3.0 lp/cm) compared to double-sided (MTF10% = 4.9 lp/cm) pRad with ideal tracking detectors. Using realistic trackers the difference decreased to 30%, with MTF10% of 4.0 lp/cm for the realistic double-sided and 2.7 lp/cm for the realistic single-sided setup. When studying an anthropomorphic paediatric head phantom both single- and double-sided set-ups performed similarly where the difference in water equivalent thickness (WET) between the two set-ups were less than 0.01 mm in homogeneous areas of the head. Larger discrepancies between the two set-ups were visible in high density gradients like the facial structures. A complete CT reconstruction of a Catphan$^{\circledR}$ module was performed. Assuming ideal detectors, the obtained spatial resolution was 5.1 lp/cm for double-sided and 3.8 lp/cm for the single-sided setup. Double- and single-sided pRad with realistic tracker properties returned a spatial resolution of 3.8 lp/cm and 3.2 lp/cm, respectively. Future studies should investigate the development of dedicated reconstruction algorithms targeted for single-sided particle imaging.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIOPen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectproton radiographyen_US
dc.subjectproton computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectlist mode imagingen_US
dc.subjectmost likely pathen_US
dc.subjectimage reconstructionen_US
dc.titleImage quality of list-mode proton imaging without front trackersen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicineen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-19en_US
dc.source.volume65en_US
dc.source.journalPhysics in Medicine and Biologyen_US
dc.source.issue13en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1361-6560/ab8ddb
dc.identifier.cristin1825249
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 250858en_US
dc.source.articlenumber135012en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal