Blar i HVL Open på forfatter "Juhl, Carsten Bogh"
-
Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
Andreasen, Jane; Nørgaard, Birgitte; Draborg, Eva; Juhl, Carsten Bogh; Yost, Jennifer; Brunnhuber, Klara; Robinson, Karen A.; Lund, Hans Aage (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2022)Background Redundancy is an unethical, unscientific, and costly challenge in clinical health research. There is a high risk of redundancy when existing evidence is not used to justify the research question when a new study ... -
Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review
Lund, Hans Aage; Robinson, Karen A.; Gjerland, Ane K.; Nykvist, Hanna; Drachen, Thea Marie; Christensen, Robin; Juhl, Carsten Bogh; Jamtvedt, Gro; Nortvedt, Monica Wammen; Bjerrum, Merete; Westmore, Matt; Yost, Jennifer; Brunnhuber, Klara (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2022)Background Several studies have documented the production of wasteful research, defined as research of no scientific importance and/or not meeting societal needs. We argue that this redundancy in research may to a large ... -
Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
Draborg, Eva; Andreasen, Jane; Nørgaard, Birgitte; Juhl, Carsten Bogh; Yost, Jennifer; Brunnhuber, Klara; Robinson, Karen A.; Lund, Hans Aage (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2022)Background Results of new studies should be interpreted in the context of what is already known to compare results and build the state of the science. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify and synthesise ...