Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTokheim, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorDyngeland, Espen Søreide
dc.contributor.authorJobst, Solvejg
dc.contributor.authorSkrobanek, Jan
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T13:58:25Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T13:58:25Z
dc.date.created2024-09-29T23:23:21Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1748-135X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3173425
dc.description.abstractOne of the most significant aspects of increased inequalities in society are those pertaining to educational inequality, or disparities related to access, uptake and completion of education. Of decisive interest in this context are challenges and dilemmas facing practices which try to tackle or mitigate educational inequalities. Although research on the topic has developed considerably in the last two decades, there is still a lack of research looking at concrete practice from an internationally comparative perspective. Through qualitative practice research, including problem-centred expert interviews, focus groups and guided tours, we have investigated the challenges and dilemmas which obstruct the implementation, development and day-to-day activities of educational practices. We introduce this article by providing our theoretical perspectives on educational equality and its necessary pre-conditions. We argue in favour of a much more emancipatory educational practice in the sense of a Freire-inspired ideal of fostering participation, self-determination and solidarity in both formal and non-formal educational environments. These theoretical considerations are then related to concrete practices, whereby we focus on the perspectives of stakeholders and educational practitioners involved such as teachers, social workers, non-formal educators or coaches. Based on our empirical material we move on to reflect on challenges and dilemmas faced in such practices. We systematise these cross-national challenges into seven categories which we have labelled ‘The seven Ps’, namely: Politics, Placement, Partnerships, Provision, Personnel, Parents, and Participants. We conclude by explaining why this framework should be applicable to development education, arguing how these categories may serve as a cautionary framework for developing pioneering practices striving for social justice across the global community.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCentre for Global Educationen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.developmenteducationreview.com/issue/issue-39/challenges-faced-pioneering-practices-tackling-educational-inequalities-europe
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleChallenges Faced in Pioneering Practices Tackling Educational Inequalities in Europeen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber117-135en_US
dc.source.journalPolicy & Practice: A Development Education Reviewen_US
dc.source.issue39en_US
dc.identifier.cristin2305917
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal