Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGraue, Marit
dc.contributor.authorStrandberg, Ragnhild Bjarkøy
dc.contributor.authorLie, Silje Stangeland
dc.contributor.authorSigurdardottir, Árún K.
dc.contributor.authorRichards, David A
dc.contributor.authorKolltveit, Beate-Christin Hope
dc.contributor.authorHaugstvedt, Anne
dc.coverage.spatialNorwayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T12:16:09Z
dc.date.available2021-02-19T12:16:09Z
dc.date.created2021-02-16T16:53:55Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationHernar, I., Graue, M., Strandberg, R. B., Lie, S. S., Sigurdardottir, A. K., Richards, D. A., Kolltveit, B. C. H., & Haugstvedt, A. (2021). Young adults with type 1 diabetes and their experiences with diabetes follow‐up and participation in the DiaPROM pilot trial: A qualitative study. Diabetic Medicine.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0742-3071
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2729230
dc.description.abstractAim To explore young adults' experiences of outpatient follow‐up appointments, completing electronic Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), and using the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) scale during the Diabetes Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (DiaPROM) pilot trial. Methods We performed a qualitative study among 19 young adults (aged 22–39 years) with type 1 diabetes who participated in the pilot trial. Between February and June 2019, we conducted individual, semi‐structured telephone interviews with participants from the intervention and control arms. We analysed the data using thematic analysis. Results Our analyses generated three themes, each with two subthemes: (1) Follow‐up with limitations; (i) Marginal dialogue about everyday challenges, (ii) Value of supportive relationships and continuity, indicate that previous follow‐up had been experienced as challenging and insufficient. (2) New insights and raised awareness; (i) More life‐oriented insights, (ii) Moving out of the comfort zone, suggest mostly positive experiences with completing questionnaires and discussing the PAID scores. (3) Addressing problem areas with an open mind; (i) Need for elaboration, (ii) Preparedness for dialogue, indicate that both openness and explanations were vital in the follow‐up. Conclusions Participants characterised the previous follow‐up as challenging and insufficient. They described completing and using the PAID as somewhat uncomfortable yet worthwhile. Our findings also suggest that by utilising diabetes distress data alongside health and biomedical outcomes, consultations became more attuned to the young adults' wishes and needs, mainly because the dialogue was more focused and direct. Hence, the PAID has the potential to facilitate person‐centredness and improve patient–provider relationships.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitusen_US
dc.subjectempowermenten_US
dc.subjectoutpatient careen_US
dc.subjectpatient-centred careen_US
dc.subjectprofessional–patient relationsen_US
dc.subjectself reporten_US
dc.subjecttype 1 adulten_US
dc.titleYoung adults with type 1 diabetes and their experiences with diabetes follow‐up and participation in the DiaPROM pilot trial: A qualitative studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.journalDiabetic Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dme.14535
dc.identifier.cristin1890555
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal