Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStien, Nicolay
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Helene
dc.contributor.authorRavnøy, Aril Hagen
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorSæterbakken, Atle Hole
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-03T08:28:30Z
dc.date.available2021-02-03T08:28:30Z
dc.date.created2020-08-28T18:16:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationStien, N., Pedersen, H., Ravnøy, A. H., Andersen, V., & Saeterbakken, A. H. (2020). Training specificity performing single-joint vs. multi-joint resistance exercises among physically active females: A randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE, 15(5), 1-12.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2725926
dc.description.abstractResistance-training of the lower limbs can be performed using exercises moving one (single-joint exercises) or several joints (multi-joint exercises). This study compared the effects of training one multi-joint exercise (leg press) or two single-joint exercises (leg extension and kickback) on dynamic and isometric strength and the transferability of dynamic strength between exercises. Fifty-three physically active women were randomized to a multi-joint (MJ) training group (age = 21.95±0.82 years, mass = 64.85±5.76 kg, height = 167.35±2.47 cm; n = 20), single-joint (SJ) training group (age = 22.56±1.66 years, mass = 64.85±5.76 kg, height = 165.94±2.84 cm; n = 18), or a control (CON) group (age = 21.27±0.68 years, mass = 68.43±4.86 kg, height = 168.63±2.84 cm; n = 15). The training groups participated in an 8-week supervised single- or multi-joint lower limb training consisting of 18 sessions. Pre- and post-training, six repetitions maximum (RM) and maximal voluntary isometric contraction in the three exercises were assessed, along with electromyography of the superficial quadriceps muscles. Improvements in all dynamic exercises were greatest after training the specific exercises (ES = 1.26–2.14, P<0.001–0.025) and all were greater in the training groups than in the CON group (ES = 1.43–3.31, P<0.001–0.021). The SJ group improved 6RM in leg extension and kickback more than leg press (ES = 1.51 and 2.04, respectively, P<0.001), whereas the MJ group improved leg press 6RM more than kickback (ES = 1.10, P = 0.002). However, leg press and leg extension strength improved similarly in the MJ group (ES = 0.54, P = 0.072). All strength and electromyographic measures remained unchanged in the CON group (ES = 0.00–0.44, P = 0.412–0.966). Improved dynamic strength in leg press, kickback and leg extension is best attained by training the specific exercises, but both training modalities can improve strength across all exercises.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPLoSen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTraining specificity performing single-joint vs. multi-joint resistance exercises among physically active females: A randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 Stien et al.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Idrettsmedisinske fag: 850::Treningslære: 851en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-12en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0233540
dc.identifier.cristin1825861
dc.source.articlenumbere0233540en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal