Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLunde, Lene
dc.contributor.authorBaerheim, Anders
dc.contributor.authorJohannessen, Ane
dc.contributor.authorAase, Ingunn
dc.contributor.authorAlmendingen, Kari
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Irene Aasen
dc.contributor.authorBengtsson, Rutt Venke
dc.contributor.authorBrenna, Sissel Johansson
dc.contributor.authorHauksdottir, Nanna
dc.contributor.authorSteinsbekk, Aslak
dc.contributor.authorRosvold, Elin Olaug
dc.coverage.spatialNorwayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-21T09:54:27Z
dc.date.available2020-09-21T09:54:27Z
dc.date.created2020-09-02T08:58:58Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationLunde, L., Bærheim, A., Johannessen, A., Aase, I., Almendingen, K., Andersen, I. A., … Rosvold, E. O. (2020). Evidence of validity for the Norwegian version of the interprofessional collaborative competency attainment survey (ICCAS). Journal of Interprofessional Care, 1–8.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1356-1820
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2678736
dc.description.abstractThis was a validation study of the Norwegian version of The Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS). ICCAS consists of 20 retrospective pre- and post-questions, where respondents rate their agreement with regard to self-assessed competencies after participating in interprofessional education courses. It has been validated across various settings. The questionnaire was translated using the back-translation technique. We investigated evidence of validity regarding content, response process, and internal structure. Data were obtained from health and social care students (n = 1440, response rate 42.8%) participating in 12 different interprofessional courses in seven education institutions in Norway using a cross-sectional design. Exploratory factor analysis indicated one retracted factor for pre-scores and one retracted factor for post-scores. High McDonald’s omega values indicated good internal consistency. Item deletion did not improve the scale’s overall consistency on pre- or post-scores. We observed higher mean post-scores than pre-scores with moderate-to-large effect sizes, indicating a positive change in self-assessed interprofessional capabilities after training. Our findings indicate that the Norwegian version of ICCAS is a valid tool that may be implemented across a wide range of interprofessional education courses. Finally, our findings support earlier recommendations that ICCAS should be analyzed at an overall level to address change in interprofessional capabilities.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectinterprofessional educationen_US
dc.subjectstudent assessmenten_US
dc.subjectinstrument validationen_US
dc.subjectICCASen_US
dc.titleEvidence of validity for the Norwegian version of the interprofessional collaborative competency attainment survey (ICCAS)en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Pedagogiske fag: 280en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Interprofessional Careen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13561820.2020.1791806
dc.identifier.cristin1826628
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal