Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSandvik, Reidun Karin Norheim Myhre
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Brita Fosser
dc.contributor.authorRygh, Lars Jørgen
dc.contributor.authorMoi, Asgjerd Litleré
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-22T07:27:29Z
dc.date.available2020-04-22T07:27:29Z
dc.date.created2020-02-10T10:57:50Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSandvik, R. K., Olsen, B. F., Rygh, L. J. & Moi, A. L. (2020). Pain relief from nonpharmacological interventions in the intensive care unit: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(9-10), 1488-1498.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0962-1067
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2651975
dc.description.abstractAims and Objectives To describe what is known from the existing literature on nonpharmacological interventions targeting pain in patients admitted to the ICU. Background Patients receiving intensive care nursing are exposed to a wide range of pain provoking tissue damage, diseases, surgery and other medical procedures in addition to the pain caused by nursing care procedures. The present shift to light sedation to improve patient outcomes and comfort underscores the need for effective pain management. Opioids are the mainstay for treating pain in the ICUs, whereas nonpharmacological treatments are understudied and possibly under‐used. Method A scoping review was undertaken using five of the six steps in the Arksey and O´Malley framework: (a) identification of the research question, (b) identification of relevant studies, (c) study selection, (d) charting the data and (e) collating, summarising and reporting the results. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, BMJ Best Practice, British Nursing Index and AMED databases were searched using relevant keywords to capture extensive evidence. Data were analysed using the six‐step criteria for scoping reviews suggested by Arksey and O´Malley for data extraction. To ensure quality and transparency, we enclosed the relevant Equator checklist PRISMA. Results Our search yielded 10,985 articles of which 12 studies were included. Tools for pain assessments were VAS, NRS, ESAS and BPS. Interventions explored were hypnosis, simple massage, distraction, relaxation, spiritual care, harp music, music therapy, listening to natural sounds, passive exercise, acupuncture, ice packs and emotional support. Reduction in pain intensity was conferred for hypnosis, acupuncture and natural sounds. Conclusion The findings support further investigations of acupuncture, hypnosis and listening to natural sounds. Relevance to Clinical Practice The main finding suggests the use of comprehensive multimodal interventions to investigate the effects of nonpharmacological treatment protocols on pain intensity, pain proportion and the impact on opioid consumption and sedation requirements.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectintensive care uniten_US
dc.subjectnonpharmacological treatmenten_US
dc.subjectpainen_US
dc.subjectpain managementen_US
dc.titlePain relief from nonpharmacological interventions in the intensive care unit: A scoping reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Sykepleievitenskap: 808en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1488-1498en_US
dc.source.volume29en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Clinical Nursingen_US
dc.source.issue9-10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.15194
dc.identifier.cristin1792510
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal