Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorValaker, Irene
dc.contributor.authorFridlund, Bengt Gotthard Anton
dc.contributor.authorWentzel-Larsen, Tore
dc.contributor.authorHadjistaropoulos, Heather
dc.contributor.authorNordrehaug, Jan Erik
dc.contributor.authorRotevatn, Svein
dc.contributor.authorRåholm, Maj-Britt
dc.contributor.authorNorekvål, Tone M.
dc.coverage.spatialNorwaynb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-11T10:31:36Z
dc.date.available2019-06-11T10:31:36Z
dc.date.created2019-03-20T09:39:31Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationValaker, I., Fridlund, B., Wentzel-Larsen, T., Hadjistavropoulos, H., Nordrehaug, J. E., Rotevatn, S., . . . Norekvål, T. M. (2019). Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the heart continuity of care questionnaire (HCCQ). BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1)nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1471-2288
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2600456
dc.description.abstractBackground Continuity of cardiac care after hospital discharge is a priority, especially as healthcare systems become increasingly complex and fragmented. There are few available instruments to measure continuity of cardiac care, especially from the patient perspective. The aim of this study was (1) to translate and adapt the Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire (HCCQ) to conditions in Norway, and (2) to determine its psychometric properties in self-report format administered to patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods The HCCQ was first translated into Norwegian from the original English version, following a widely used cross-cultural adaptation process. Data were collected before hospital discharge and in a follow-up after 2 months. To assess psychometric properties, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed and three aspects of construct validity were evaluated: structural validity, hypotheses testing and cross-cultural validation. Internal consistency of the HCCQ subscales was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha, while intra-class correlation (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability. Additionally, socio-demographic and patient-reported data were collected to correlate with HCCQ scores. Results Of those included at baseline, 436 (76%) completed the questionnaires after 2 months. CFA suggested that the fit of the HCCQ data to a 3-factor model was modest (RMSEA = 0.11, CFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.90). However, convergent validity was satisfactory, based on existing research. Internal consistency was good, as indicated by its Cronbach’s alphas: total continuity of care (0.95); informational (0.93), relational (0.87), and management (0.89) continuity. The ICC for the total HCCQ score was 0.80 (95% CI [0.71, 0.87] p < 0.001). As indicated by negative care experiences (rated as 1 or 2 on the five-point scale), patients seemed to have limited knowledge about medical treatment, lifestyle modification and follow-up after PCI. Participation in cardiac rehabilitation and longer consultations with the general practitioner after hospital discharge were positively correlated with better continuity of care. Conclusions Implementation of the HCCQ will likely support healthcare providers and researchers in identifying problem areas of continuity of cardiac care and in evaluating interventions aimed at improving continuity of care.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectcardiac carenb_NO
dc.subjectconfirmatory factor analysisnb_NO
dc.subjectcontinuity of carenb_NO
dc.subjectcross-cultural adaptationnb_NO
dc.subjectpatient perspectivenb_NO
dc.subjectpercutaneous coronary interventionnb_NO
dc.subjectpsychometric propertiesnb_NO
dc.subjectvalidationnb_NO
dc.titleAdaptation and psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the heart continuity of care questionnaire (HCCQ)nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2019.nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Kardiologi: 771nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800nb_NO
dc.source.volume19nb_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Medical Research Methodologynb_NO
dc.source.issue62nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12874-019-0706-z
dc.identifier.cristin1686189
cristin.unitcode203,11,1,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for helse- og omsorgsvitskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal