Blar i Senter for kunnskapsbasert praksis på tidsskrift "Systematic Reviews"

Viser treff 1-4 av 4

    • Evidence Synthesis International (ESI): Position Statement 

      Gough, David; Davies, Phil; Jamtvedt, Gro; Langlois, Etienne V.; Littell, Julia; Lotfi, Tamara; Masset, Edoardo; Merlin, Tracy; Pullin, Andrew S.; Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel; Røttingen, John-Arne; Sena, Emily; Stewart, Ruth; Tovey, David; White, Howard; Yost, Jennifer; Lund, Hans; Grimshaw, Jeremy (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2020)
      This paper is the initial Position Statement of Evidence Synthesis International, a new partnership of organizations that produce, support and use evidence synthesis around the world. The paper (i) argues for the importance ...

    • Lack of systematicity in research prioritisation processes — a scoping review of evidence syntheses 

      Lund, Hans Aage; Tang, Lars; Poulsen, Ingrid; la Cour, Karen; Bjerrum, Merete; Nielsen, Claus Vinther; Maribo, Thomas (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2022)
      Background A systematically and transparently prepared research priority-setting process within a specific scientific area is essential in order to develop a comprehensive and progressive evidence-based approach that will ...

    • Perspectives on systematic review protocol registration: a survey amongst stakeholders in the clinical research publication process 

      van der Braak, Kim; Heus, Pauline; Orelio, Claudia; Netterström-Wedin, Fredh; Robinson, Karen A.; Lund, Hans Aage; Hooft, Lotty (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2023)
      Background: As systematic reviews (SRs) inform healthcare decisions, it is key that they address relevant questions and use rigorous methodology. Registration of SR protocols helps researchers identify relevant topics ...

    • Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis 

      Eiring, Øystein; Brurberg, Kjetil Gundro; Nytrøen, Kari; Nylenna, Magne (Journal article; Peer reviewed, 2018)
      Background Conducting systematic reviews is time-consuming but crucial to construct evidence-based patient decision aids, clinical practice guidelines and decision analyses. New methods might enable developers to produce ...