Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHaugarvoll, Kristoffer
dc.contributor.authorSolvang, Stein-Erik Hafstad
dc.contributor.authorNorekvål, Tone Merete
dc.contributor.authorSkogseth, Ragnhild Eide
dc.contributor.authorandreassen, Ole A
dc.contributor.authorÅrsland, Dag
dc.contributor.authorNeerland, Bjørn Erik
dc.contributor.authorNordrehaug, Jan Erik
dc.contributor.authorTell, Grethe S
dc.contributor.authorGiil, Lasse Melvær
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T06:00:33Z
dc.date.available2024-04-12T06:00:33Z
dc.date.created2024-02-14T09:52:01Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0002-0729
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3126182
dc.description.abstractBackground: In-hospital delirium is associated with adverse outcomes and is underdiagnosed, limiting research and clinical follow-up. Objective: To compare the incidence of in-hospital delirium determined by chart-based review of electronic medical records (D-CBR) with delirium discharge diagnoses (D-DD). Furthermore, to identify differences in symptoms, treatments and delirium triggers between D-CBR and D-DD. Method: The community-based cohort included 2,115 participants in the Hordaland Health Study born between 1925 and 1927. Between 2018 and 2022, we retrospectively reviewed hospital electronic medical records from baseline (1997–99) until death prior to 2023. D-DD and D-CBR were validated using The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for delirium. Results: Of the 2,115 participants, 638 had in-hospital delirium. The incidence rate (IR) of D-CBR was 29.8 [95% confidence interval 28, 32] per 1,000 person-years, whereas the IR by D-DD was 3.4 [2.8, 4.2]. The IR ratio was 9.14 (P < 0.001). Patients who received pharmacological treatment for delirium (n = 121, odds ratio (OR) 3.4, [2.1, 5.4], P < 0.001), who were affected by acute memory impairment (n = 149, OR 2.8, [1.8, 4.5], P < 0.001), or change in perception (n = 137, OR 2.9, [1.8, 4.6] P < 0.001) had higher odds for D-DD. In contrast, post-operative cases (OR 0.2, [0.1, 0.4], P < 0.001) had lower odds for D-DD. Conclusion: Underdiagnosis of in-hospital delirium was a major issue in our study, especially in less severe delirium cases. Our findings emphasise the need for integrating systematic delirium diagnostics and documentation into hospital admission and discharge routines.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDelirium is frequently underdiagnosed among older hospitalised patients despite available information in hospital medical recordsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2024en_US
dc.source.volume53en_US
dc.source.journalAge and Ageingen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ageing/afae006
dc.identifier.cristin2245792
dc.source.articlenumberafae006en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal