Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFiliatreault, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorGrimshaw, Jeremy M.
dc.contributor.authorKreindler, Sara A.
dc.contributor.authorChochinov, Alecs
dc.contributor.authorLinton, Janice
dc.contributor.authorChatterjee, Rashmita
dc.contributor.authorAzeez, Rilwan
dc.contributor.authorDoupe, Malcolm
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T08:59:56Z
dc.date.available2023-11-17T08:59:56Z
dc.date.created2023-06-29T14:06:02Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. 2023, 29 (6), 1039-1053.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1356-1294
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3103129
dc.description.abstractRationale Older adults are at high risk of developing delirium in the emergency department (ED); however, it is often missed or undertreated. Improving ED delirium care is challenging in part due to a lack of standards to guide best practice. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) translate evidence into recommendations to improve practice. Aim To critically appraise and synthesize CPG recommendations for delirium care relevant to older ED patients. Methods We conducted an umbrella review to retrieve relevant CPGs. Quality of the CPGs and their recommendations were critically appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation (AGREE)-II; and Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation—Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) instruments. A threshold of 70% or greater in the AGREE-II Rigour of Development domain was used to define high-quality CPGs. Delirium recommendations from CPGs meeting this threshold were included in the synthesis and narrative analysis. Results AGREE-II Rigour of Development scores ranged from 37% to 83%, with 5 of 10 CPGs meeting the predefined threshold. AGREE-REX overall calculated scores ranged from 44% to 80%. Recommendations were grouped into screening, diagnosis, risk reduction, and management. Although none of the included CPGs were ED-specific, many recommendations incorporated evidence from this setting. There was agreement that screening for nonmodifiable risk factors is important to define high-risk populations, and those at risk should be screened for delirium. The ‘4A's Test’ was the recommended tool to use in the ED specifically. Multicomponent strategies were recommended for delirium risk reduction, and for its management if it occurs. The only area of disagreement was for the short-term use of antipsychotic medication in urgent situations. Conclusion This is the first known review of delirium CPGs including a critical appraisal and synthesis of recommendations. Researchers and policymakers can use this synthesis to inform future improvement efforts and research in the ED. Registration This study has been registered in the Open Science Framework registries: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TG7S6OSF.IO/TG7S6.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA critical appraisal and recommendation synthesis of delirium clinical practice guidelines relevant to the care of older adults in the emergency department: An umbrella reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Authorsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1039-1053en_US
dc.source.volume29en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Evaluation In Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jep.13883
dc.identifier.cristin2159492
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 188928en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal