Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMaceachern, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorGinsburg, Liane R.
dc.contributor.authorHoben, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorDoupe, Malcolm
dc.contributor.authorWagg, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorKnopp-Sihota, Jennifer A.
dc.contributor.authorCranley, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorSong, Yuting
dc.contributor.authorEstabrooks, Carole A.
dc.contributor.authorBerta, Whitney
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-08T08:09:42Z
dc.date.available2023-09-08T08:09:42Z
dc.date.created2023-05-25T11:14:51Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open Quality. 2023, 12 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2399-6641
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3088120
dc.description.abstractQuality improvement (QI) projects are common in healthcare settings and often involve interdisciplinary teams working together towards a common goal. Many interventions and programmes have been introduced through research to convey QI skills and knowledge to healthcare workers, however, a few studies have attempted to differentiate between what individuals ‘learn’ or ‘know’ versus their capacity to apply their learnings in complex healthcare settings. Understanding and differentiating between delivery, receipt, and enactment of QI skills and knowledge is important because while enactment alone does not guarantee desired QI outcomes, it might be reasonably assumed that ‘better enactment’ is likely to lead to better outcomes. This paper describes the development, application and validation of a tool to measure enactment of core QI skills and knowledge of a complex QI intervention in a healthcare setting. Based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Model for Improvement, existing QI assessment tools, literature on enactment fidelity and our research protocols, 10 indicators related to core QI skills and knowledge were determined. Definitions and assessment criteria were tested and refined in five iterative cycles. Qualitative data from four QI teams in long-term care homes were used to test and validate the tool. The final measurement tool contains 10 QI indicators and a five-point scale. Inter-rater reliability ranged from good to excellent. Usability and acceptability among raters were considered high. This measurement tool assists in identifying strengths and weaknesses of a QI team and allows for targeted feedback on core QI components. The indicators developed in our tool and the approach to tool development may be useful in other health related contexts where similar data are collected.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDeveloping a tool to measure enactment of complex quality improvement interventions in healthcareen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023en_US
dc.source.pagenumber7en_US
dc.source.volume12en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Open Qualityen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002027
dc.identifier.cristin2149187
dc.source.articlenumbere002027en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal