Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHarboe, Ingrid
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-16T06:33:04Z
dc.date.available2020-07-16T06:33:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2669232
dc.descriptionMasteroppgave i kunnskapsbasert praksis, Høgskulen på Vestlandet, campus Bergenen_US
dc.description.abstractThis master’s thesis consist of an introductory part describing the background for preforming the validation study, the methods used, and a discussion of the methods and results. The introductory part describes the filter validation study in more detail than possible in the article manuscript. Background: Health technology assessments (HTAs) are increasingly used by Norwegian health authorities as the evidence base when prioritizing which health care services to offer. HTAs typically consist of a systematic review of the effects and safety of two or more health care interventions, and an economic evaluation of the interventions, based on systematic literature searches in bibliographic databases. Objective: To identify the best performing of seven search filters to retrieve health economic evaluations used to inform health technology assessments (HTAs), by comparing the costeffectiveness analysis (CEA) filter to six published filters in Ovid Embase, and achieve a sensitivity of at least 0.90 with a precision of 0.10, and specificity of at least 0.95. Methods: In this filter validation study, the included filters’ performances were compared against a gold standard of economic evaluations published in 2008-2013 (n=2,248) from the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), and the corresponding records (n=2,198) in the current version of Ovid Embase Results: The CEA filter had a sensitivity of 0.899 and precision of 0.029. One filter had a sensitivity of 0.880 and a precision of 0.075, which was closest to the objective. The filter with lowest sensitivity (0.702) had a precision of 0.141. Conclusion: Developing search filters for identifying health economic evaluations, with a good balance between sensitivity and precision, is possible but challenging. Researchers should agree on acceptable levels of performance before concluding on which search filter to use.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHøgskulen på Vestlandeten_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectMeSHen_US
dc.subjectbibliografiske databaseren_US
dc.subjectinformasjonslagring og- gjenfinningen_US
dc.subjectsensitivitet og spesifisiteten_US
dc.subjectkostnad-nytte-analyseen_US
dc.subjectinformation storage and retrievalen_US
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subjectcost-benefit-analysisen_US
dc.titleTesting the best performing methodological search filters to retrieve health economic evaluations in Embase: A filter validation studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeTesting av søkefiltre for best gjenfinning av helseøkonomiske evalueringer i Embase: En valideringsstudieen_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.description.localcodeMAKP601en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal